Friday, October 3, 2008

The Tiny Fey Glasses are Gone


So what did everyone think about the debate?

I thought Sarah Palin avoided making any major blunders--at least, we didn't see that moose-in-the-headlights look that was on display throughout her Couric interviews. It seems she is best when allowed to stick to rehearsed talking points.

Biden, though, was really top-notch. In addition to actually answering the interview questions, he turned in the best debate performance we have seen so far from any of the four candidates, in my opinion. I love when he underlined, clearly and forcefully, the themes that define his ticket best: relief for the middle class, opposition to tax breaks for the super-wealthy and corporate America, and concern for the basic needs of families sitting around their kitchen tables right now. I thought he was able to make that connection without being schmaltzy. The point in the debate where he choked up when talking about being a single parent was powerful, even more so when he followed it up by telling Americans that he understands they are having a hard time right now. You would have to be a seriously jaded individual not to see real human emotion and authenticity in that moment.

I'm sure there are many Americans out there who also connected to Governor Palin last night, but I wasn't one of them. The "doggone it" and "say it ain't say joe" and the dropped g's and the winking at the camera seemed part of a routine being relentlessly performed, rather than a natural expression of this person's character and background. Repeatedly calling her running mate a "maverick" (a real missed drinking game opportunity there) also doesn't make it so, and I was pleased when Biden finally listed the ways in which McCain has not been anything but a supporter and promoter of the Republican status quo.

In her defense, ultimately Sarah Palin had the much harder job here--in addition to having to cram her way into an understanding of national policy in four weeks, she is also being asked to perform those verbal gymnastics that turn fiction (conservative economic policy has worked/ pre-emptive war is a good idea/ McCain is a much different candidate than Bush) into seeming truth. Significantly more gifted politicians would also find that a hard task. What helps is that she seems actually to believe these things, but how much easier it is to make a strong case with so many of the rational, logical facts and evidence on your side. That is why this is the Democrats' race to lose.

I can't end before commenting on the wacky moment that was Palin's gusto for the expansion of vice-presidential powers (as put into motion by the ever-so-popular Dick Cheney). I thought for a strange, sci-fi second that we might actually see her twitch as she got zapped by offstage Republican handlers to stop her from continuing to list all the new things that we could maybe, you know, let the Vice-President do. No campaign advisor wants to hear their candidate veer into "let's interpret the Constitution a little more loosely so I can have more power" territory.

Speaking of veering into unfamiliar territory, it looks like I'm headed to Ohio. The Obama headquarters in Cleveland returned my call today with what can only be described as unbridled enthusiasm about the possibility of me showing up in their state to help the campaign. It's hard to resist the siren call of "we can definitely use you!" "we'll find you housing!" and "Cleveland is really not so bad." Well, maybe not so much that last one. All that's left now is to cross my fingers that my experience in the middle of the country among strangers will be more "Mayberry" and less "Children of the Corn."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sara,

Here's wishing you safe travels among my people (I grew up in Indiana... not so different). I have to believe that several "swing states" will just swing right on over to blue by the time Nov 4 rolls around. Good Luck and God Bless!

Matt

ps ~ i am soooooo glad to hear that the dropped "g's" were not my sole cross to bear... bare?... her "palinisms" were driving me NUTZ!

Anonymous said...

Ah… so here is where you’ve been posting your political discussions when avoiding them with me. Good to know.

Alright, for now, let’s deal with the fictionalization of McCain’s record in an attempt to paint him as another 4 years of George Bush. You’re right, calling McCain a “maverick” and someone who shirks the Republican status quo doesn’t make it so. But the following disagreements with Bush and the hard-line Republicans absolutely do:

McCain sponsored McCain-Feingold, a campaign finance reform bill which was strongly opposed by many Republicans because of the view it gave Democrats the advantage in fundraising (due to labor unions).

He also sponsored McCain-Kennedy, a huge immigration reform bill that ultimately failed to pass, due to strong opposition by Bush and Republicans.

Along with Ben Nelson (D-Neb), McCain brokered the agreement between the “Gang Of 14” to prevent Republicans from using the nicknamed “Nuclear Option” in regards to judicial nominee issue, angering the Republican leadership.

During the last election, McCain came out and publicly denounced the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth over their attacks on John Kerry.

In an issue near and dear to your heart, Sara, McCain sponsored the first ever climate change legislation “The Climate Stewardship Act” first in 2003 and then again in 2005, again much to the opposition of the Republican congress. Grist.org (you might know them better than I, it is a environmental website) called them “acts of courage” with “little political reward”.

McCain repeatedly criticized Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense, and in particular, he his handling of the Iraq War. He called Rumsfeld “one of the worst Secretaries of Defense in history” and criticizing him as early as 2005 for not sending more troops.

Attempts by the Democrats to distort the record on this last one are perhaps the most disingenuous of all. When McCain supported Bush’s proposal for the surge, Democrats claimed this was McCain flip-flopping his position. Apparently Democrats feel that one needs to oppose Bush’s policies for the sake of blindly opposing them; not for what they actually are. If Bush finally gets rid of Rumsfeld and changes his policies to match what McCain has been suggesting for years, Bush and McCain are now going to agree. A policy change, by the way, that has been highly successful.

Of course Biden can cite instances that Bush and McCain agree. They belong to the same political party, for crying out loud! If they disagreed on everything, McCain would belong to a different political party. Speaking of which, McCain was bucking the core Republican leadership so much in 2004, that the Democrats apparently considered asking him to be Kerry’s running mate that year. But finding agreements between two people does not somehow mean that there weren't also many and significant DISagreements.

Portraying McCain as someone who has been lock-step with Bush and the Republican leadership over the years is an outright deception and simple propaganda. And repeatedly saying it doesn’t make it so.

scs said...

"Send me to a Swing State" is an equal opportunity commenting blog! :)

huntsmanic said...

"...And repeatedly saying it doesn’t make it so"

this is true, and also funny, as it's the main tactic of the mccain campaign. a cat in a corner does tend to mewl.

heather speirs said...

Good luck to you, Sara! Here in Philly, things are lookin good for Obama. But in the rest of the state...our fingers are crossed.